How Zero Contact GXP Audits Ensure Compliance While Protecting Auditors and Auditees during the Global Pandemic

Remote audits are crucial for auditors and auditees in the pharmaceutical industry to help reduce health risks since the advent of the COVID-19 global pandemic. On-site inspections across pharma and other industries may not be possible due to multiple factors, including restrictions related to travelling, limited access to facilities to minimize health risks, and other restrictions governed by local authorities’ interim policies.

In addition to minimizing risk associated with the pandemic, it is also important to minimize the risks by identifying and addressing any compliance concerns as early as possible in the clinical trial. Zero contact audits pose a possible answer. Through organized preparation, pre-assessment of technical requirements, and providing a well-developed and detailed inspection agenda, zero contact audits can be a helpful tool to ensure compliance.

On-site audits pose health risks

The CDC recommends that people not living in the same home maintain social distancing by staying at least six feet apart, washing their hands frequently, and wearing a mask.

With the spread of COVID-19, social distancing can be quite difficult in many work environments and countless companies have opted to allow colleagues to work from home for extended periods of time.

Globally, this has forced clinical trial sponsors and regulatory agencies alike to reevaluate their auditing procedures, and it has drove them to find alternate methods and existing technologies to aid in these reviews. Utilizing tools already in place, firms have recognized that many portions of the audit process can be achieved remotely.

Increased audit backlogs causing issues

Back-logged, or delayed conduct of routine and other types of, audits has been an issue even prior to the pandemic. Now the issue is exacerbated, propelling the auditors to use remote techniques to catch up and also stay on top of the audits prescribed as part of their compliance programs.

Regulatory bodies have issued guidance on support for these measures, as well as reminders that quality audits are not optional and must continue as long as manufacturing, clinical trials, and product distribution continues.

Read the FDA statement from July 10, 2020 discussing remote assessments.

Why zero contact audits are critical to every pharma company

Zero contact audits are crucial in ensuring that the rights, safety, and well-being of clinical trial subjects are protected, and the quality and safety of medicinal products are accurate and reliable. Using electronic and virtual systems enables qualified remote auditors to facilitate and interact directly with the auditee company staff.

These remote audits allow sponsors of clinical trials four key components:

  1. Avoid delays in supplier qualifications
  2. Address compliance findings early by reducing the audit backlog and minimizing future surprises
  3. Become more efficient and thorough by receiving, sharing, and reviewing documentation and processes
  4. Operate according to their company and facility safety protocols, reducing the potential COVID-19 exposure and related risks

Ultimately, zero contact audits can be effective. With the use of existing technological tools and remote auditing methods, sponsors can continue to do what is required by law and complete the verification of compliance through periodic audits and evaluations.

For questions on zero contact GXP audits, email media@mmsholdings.com

Additional reading

https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-10/guidanceclinicaltrials_covid19_en.pdf

https://www.excipact.org/files/EXCiPACT/Downloads/20200406%20EXCiPACT%20Procedure%20for%20audit%20postponement%20and%20for%20remote%20audits.pdf

https://www.fda.gov/media/136238/download

Suggested For You

perspectives

July 30th, 2024

The Critical Role of Quality Control (QC) – Medical Writing and Beyond

perspectives

July 23rd, 2024

PSI 2024 Ignited Conversations on External Data Sources, Requirements for Estimands, and Bayesian Methodology for Statisticians in Pharma

perspectives

July 16th, 2024

Key Steps to Successful CMC Authoring of IND and IMPD Submissions

perspectives

July 9th, 2024

Managing RTOR Submissions: How to Run a Successful Race from the Top Line Starting Line

perspectives

July 2nd, 2024

Part 1: RWD Noninterventional Study Design and FDA Engagement Opportunity for Early Stage Oncology

perspectives

June 21st, 2024

Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles: The Crucial Role of Publication in the Pharmaceutical Industry

perspectives

June 14th, 2024

A Structured Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment Throughout Product Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry

perspectives

June 6th, 2024

Datacise and Diversity in Patient Enrollment: Combining Geospatial and Demographic Data to Aid Site Selection

perspectives

May 29th, 2024

Confined Deferrals in Clinical Trial Applications: Anticipating the Revised EU CTR Transparency Rules

perspectives

May 21st, 2024

Psychedelics and Regulatory Considerations Part II: A Shift in Lexicon and Implications of “Nonmedical Use” On Labelling

perspectives

May 10th, 2024

Psychedelics in Drug Development and Regulatory Considerations Part I: Benefit-Risk

perspectives

April 29th, 2024

Validation of Clinical Dashboards for Decision Making