Understanding FDA's Revised Draft Guidance: PDUFA Formal Meetings

Are you looking for rapid feedback from the FDA on a specific topic related to your product development program? Wondering which meeting request you should submit? Let’s delve into the latest updates.

On September 22, 2023, the FDA released the eagerly anticipated revised draft guidance titled “Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants of PDUFA Products.” This guidance outlines six distinct formal meeting types under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) for sponsors seeking interaction with the FDA. They include:

  • Type A
  • Type B
  • Type B (end of phase or EOP)
  • Type C
  • Type D
  • Initial Engagement for Regulatory Advice on CDER and CBER Products (INTERACT)

Of these, Type D and INTERACT are the latest additions to the draft guidance.

So, what exactly are these new meeting types?

Type D meetings are designed to address “a narrow set of issues” – essentially crucial decision points. These meetings facilitate timely feedback, helping to advance the drug program. Here, sponsors can raise questions centered on no more than two specific topics. Importantly, the topics shouldn’t necessitate input from over three FDA disciplines or divisions. After submitting a Type D meeting request, sponsors can expect a response from the FDA within 14 days, with the meeting scheduled within 50 days.

While INTERACT meetings aren’t entirely new (they were introduced to PDUFA VII last September), they cater to unique challenges and innovative questions for CDER and CBER products in their initial development stages, like pre-pre-IND. These meetings enable sponsors to gain FDA insights early in the drug development phase, even before their IND filing. Topics for discussion could include:

  • Advanced manufacturing technologies or processes
  • Design strategies for IND-enabling toxicology studies
  • Innovative devices associated with drugs or biologics
  • The use of “New Approach Methodologies”

Similar to Type D, sponsors need to provide background packages or briefing documents when requesting an INTERACT meeting. The FDA typically responds within 21 days of such a request, arranging the meeting within the subsequent 75 days.

Circling back to our initial query, if you’re dealing with a singularly focused topic requiring input from a maximum of three FDA disciplines or divisions, a Type D meeting request is your answer. However, remember that navigating FDA meetings can be intricate. While you may perceive a meeting one way, the FDA might view it differently, especially concerning the number of disciplines or divisions involved. Fortunately, our seasoned team at MMS is here to assist with all your regulatory challenges.

Eager to learn more about navigating FDA meetings? Please click here to connect with our regulatory experts today.

Authored by: Nancy Hsu, Regulatory Affairs Associate, Regulatory Affairs.

Suggested For You

perspectives

July 30th, 2024

The Critical Role of Quality Control (QC) – Medical Writing and Beyond

perspectives

July 23rd, 2024

PSI 2024 Ignited Conversations on External Data Sources, Requirements for Estimands, and Bayesian Methodology for Statisticians in Pharma

perspectives

July 16th, 2024

Key Steps to Successful CMC Authoring of IND and IMPD Submissions

perspectives

July 9th, 2024

Managing RTOR Submissions: How to Run a Successful Race from the Top Line Starting Line

perspectives

July 2nd, 2024

Part 1: RWD Noninterventional Study Design and FDA Engagement Opportunity for Early Stage Oncology

perspectives

June 21st, 2024

Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles: The Crucial Role of Publication in the Pharmaceutical Industry

perspectives

June 14th, 2024

A Structured Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment Throughout Product Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry

perspectives

June 6th, 2024

Datacise and Diversity in Patient Enrollment: Combining Geospatial and Demographic Data to Aid Site Selection

perspectives

May 29th, 2024

Confined Deferrals in Clinical Trial Applications: Anticipating the Revised EU CTR Transparency Rules

perspectives

May 21st, 2024

Psychedelics and Regulatory Considerations Part II: A Shift in Lexicon and Implications of “Nonmedical Use” On Labelling

perspectives

May 10th, 2024

Psychedelics in Drug Development and Regulatory Considerations Part I: Benefit-Risk

perspectives

April 29th, 2024

Validation of Clinical Dashboards for Decision Making